Monday, February 05, 2007

Baptism as Symbol

This is my third in a series of short reflection papers for one of my classes this semester: Theology and the Body.

Both early Christian writer Cyril and current researcher Margaret Miles offer a glimpse into the world of early Christian baptism. Baptism for the first Christians was a deeply symbolic event with many implications for the notions of the physical body’s relationship to God. Baptism was to be taken seriously and every part of the ceremony was meant to signify the individual’s renunciation of the world and the embracing of a new lifestyle in Christ.

Today, every denomination and Christian group baptizes differently. Some baptize at infancy by sprinkling water to signify promise; some baptize by total immersion after the profession of Christian faith; some baptize both times, and still others at every point in between. Locations of baptisms can differ (indoors or out; church or swimming pool) as can the authority of the event (sacrament or ordinance). However, often lost in the debate of the parameters of baptism is its meaning for the physical body.

According to Miles, baptism was a tricky subject in the first few centuries, mainly because it needed to tiptoe around the issues of nudity and bathing. These themes were prominent in secular Roman life, and the cult of Christianity had to adequately and carefully address this with its sacred ceremony. Thus, rules were put in place to heighten the meaning of the ceremonial washing. The temporal cleansing was rare for a Christian; thus one could 'remember their baptism.'

Today, in a world of indoor plumbing and daily showers, baptism as 'cleansing' may have lost its meaning. Washing in spiritual waters may carry significance in word only. The only physical reminder for today's baptized Christians is a fond memory and maybe a photograph to commemorate the few minutes of wetness and witnesses that was their experience.

Perhaps this is why so many people get fish or crosses tattooed on ankles and backs.

Comments (2)

Anonymous

6:48 PM

nt wright adds a communal element to it, with the person's coming out of the water a symbol of leaving the egyptian slavery behind. i don't know how much weight that holds, but it seems interesting.

very interesting stuff from Miles. thanks for writing this.

for my tribe (churches of Christ) we have placed high (some might even say ridiculous) importance on baptism. i think my tribe needs to reexamine this practice because it seems a lot of the theology behind baptism is lost (just as the previous commenter suggested by NT Wright's communal understanding). maybe that is why so many do not remember their baptism. maybe some see it as another weird ritual or hoop to jump in order to not be smoted by God.

good stuff. would enjoy reading your paper on this subject.